Positive Risk Enablement Planner | Impact Insights

Positive Risk Enablement Planner (Beta Version 1)

This free beta intelligence resource helps HCBS, IDD, behavioral health, home care and human services providers create proportionate, person-centered and least-restrictive risk enablement plans aligned with rights-based practice, safeguarding, supported decision-making and community inclusion.

This intelligence resource provides general planning guidance only. It does not replace professional judgment, safeguarding procedures, supported decision-making processes, clinical advice, legal advice, state requirements, Medicaid requirements, payer expectations or organizational policy.

Sponsor this Intelligence Resource (only 1 available)

---

Organization Name Service Type HCBS / Community-Based Support IDD Services Autism Services Behavioral Health Services Home Care / Personal Care Services Aging / LTSS Services Supported Employment Housing Support / Supportive Housing Complex Community Supports Other Human Services Provider Your Role Please select... Program Manager / Service Manager Provider Executive / Senior Leader Quality / Compliance Lead Direct Support Professional / Frontline Staff Care Coordinator / Case Manager Behavior Support Professional Clinical Lead / Health Professional Safeguarding / Protection Lead State Agency / County Professional Managed Care Organization Professional Consultant Other Prefer not to say Primary Risk Enablement Context Community access / going out independently Relationships, friendships or family contact Money, shopping or financial decision-making Medication, health or treatment choices Food, nutrition, alcohol or lifestyle choices Travel, transportation or road safety Technology, online activity or social media Behavior, distress or emotional regulation Home environment, tenancy or daily living Employment, volunteering or community participation Other positive risk enablement decision Decision-Making / Consent Position Person appears able to make this decision Supported decision-making is needed Decision-making ability is unclear and needs review Guardian / legal representative involvement may be required Best-interest / substitute decision-making process may be required Coercion, undue influence or exploitation concerns may be present Not sure Current Risk Level Low — manageable with light-touch safeguards Moderate — requires agreed controls and monitoring High — requires senior review and strong safeguards Very high — requires urgent safeguarding / protective services / legal / clinical advice Current Restriction Level Minimal restriction currently in place Some restrictions or staff controls in place Significant restrictions currently in place Restrictions may be unclear, inconsistent or undocumented Rights, Safeguarding and Practice Considerations Person’s Wishes, Preferences and Desired Outcome Main Risks or Concerns Current Safeguards / Controls Already in Place Generate Positive Risk Enablement Plan

---

---

---